User talk:2019crisissimus2

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding these Wikipedia articles:

[[Three Tree Capital]]
[[The Estate of William L. Armstrong]]

Welcome

Hello, 2019crisissimus2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anja Manuel (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anja Manuel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anja Manuel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 2019crisissimus2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi - I've just taken a quick look at your contribution history, and at the disclosure on your user page. Please can you confirm whether you have read COI and PAID? You appear to be making substantial additions to the articles relating to your clients directly, without using edit requests - were you unaware that that practice is very strongly discouraged (emphasised like that in the guidelines)? Please can I ask you to desist from that immediately, and start using edit requests from this point on? Please can you also indicate which of the articles you have edited so far have any connection to any of your clients, so that I can audit the edits you've made so far? Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 15:11, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am sorry for any errors I've made. I thought that when I hit publish changes, that meant the edits were going to be reviewed? I tried just now to do and edit request, but I didn't see that option under the edit tab. Please let me know where that is so I can ensure I desist from this practice and follow the correct guidelines.

And to answer your question, please see the edits I have made below for your review. 1. I added the paragraph about the Korean War Memorial 2. I added citation number 22 and 23

Hi again. Briefly (I'm in the UK, so it's evening time):

No, when you hit Publish Changes, they aren't reviewed - they're published. Other editors may notice the change, or they may not - it's your job to make sure it's right. Just above the 'Publish Changes' button, you'll see a link to the Terms of Use - that's what you agree to abide by when you click that button.
All your contributions are viewable here. What I'm asking is which of the articles that you have edited do you have a connection with - which edits were you paid to make?
Did you follow the link to edit request? Instructions for how to make them are given there - it's done on the article talk page, not on the article itself.
Please also take a look at THREAD and INDENT, which will help you take part in threaded discussions like this. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 18:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - I see you have made a number of suggestions on talk pages, rather than editing the articles directly. That is an improvement, so thank you for that, but I'm afraid you are still not complying with the requirements outlined at WP:PAID. Please read that thoroughly, and respond to my question above - which of the articles you have made (which can be viewed in your contributions history) have been made on behalf of your clients? I am assuming that anything regarding William L. Armstrong (including your edits and requested changes at Sodbuster, Ronald Reagan and Year of the Bible, all of which are related to his political career). What about Aspen and Anja Manuel - is there any connection between them and your clients?

Please do not make any further edits before responding to these questions. Be aware that your account may be blocked from editing if you fail to adequately disclose your clients, and the articles you are editing on behalf of them. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 11:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you're doing well! The only edits I've made on behalf of a client are related to William L. Armstrong. Anja Manuel and Aspen are not clients and there is no relationship at all there. As requested, I've suspended all edits until we hash this out. Happy to discuss further!

Hi - thanks for confirming that. What I was really asking about your own contributions was which of the edits was done on behalf of your clients. So, for example: here you are editing Colorado Christian University, but you're adding information about Armstrong; here you are editing Family Support Act, adding information about Armstrong; here you are editing Tulane University, adding information about Armstrong. These are exactly the sort of edits you are not supposed to be making, you need to make an edit request, formatted as shown in the guideline I linked you to above, and declaring your interest when you do so. Please keep that in mind in future. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 2019crisissimus2! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Understanding if these are acceptable sources., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Also, I answered your COI edit request at William L. Armstrong. Please take a look at my response. {{replyto}} Can I Log In's (talk) page 21:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response to April 2020

Hello there Can I Log In's Thanks for the advice about making sure I sign my pages/ edit requests. I went on ahead and signed the last two requests I made and I'll make sure I keep doing that in the future. As for the two missing citations under the 1978 and 1984 elections, I added those too. Please check them out and let me know what you think!2019crisissimus2 (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 2019crisissimus2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 2019crisissimus2! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Question about Adding Additional Citations, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anja Manuel

Hello, 2019crisissimus2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anja Manuel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 03:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]